"We will resolve the DACA issue with heart and compassion -- but through the lawful Democratic process -- while at the same time ensuring that any immigration reform we adopt provides enduring benefits for the American citizens we were elected to serve," he said. "We must also have heart and compassion for unemployed, struggling, and forgotten Americans." – President Donald Trump
The Deferred Action for
Childhood Arrivals program (DACA), which was started by President Obama in
2012, lets young immigrants who came to the United States as children of
illegal immigrants to a) apply for temporary protection from deportation, and b) obtain work permits, attend college,
get a driver’s license, etc. There was a $495 fee attached to this, and it needed to be renewed every two years.
These immigrants became known as
DREAMers after the DREAM Act, a failed piece of legislation meant to give these particular immigrants legal status in return for attending college or joining
the military, and to eventually help them apply for citizenship. Though it kept popping up in Congress between 2001 and 2010, it never passed.
So in 2012, President Obama
used an executive order to issue DACA, which meant that these DREAMers who met
certain criteria could apply for “deferred action” every two years. This was
not a path to citizenship; "deferred action" meant that deportation
proceedings would not be started against them. They would be “lawfully present” for those two years.
This was only available for immigrants who met the following criteria:
- lived in the US since 2007
- arrived before they were 16
- were 30 or younger as of June 2012
- were in high school, had a high school diploma (or a GED), or were discharged from the Coast Guard or US Armed Forces
- had a mostly clean criminal record (not convicted of a felony or serious misdemeanor)
In 2014, President Obama
decided to expand DACA by a) loosening age restrictions and b) including parents in what was called Deferred Action For Parents Of Americans (DAPA).
Suddenly, half of the illegal immigrants in the United States were covered. A
lawsuit against both DAPA and the expansion
of DACA was successful (the Supremes deadlocked, so the 5th Circuit Court of Appeal’s decision to block the action stood). This was not, however, a lawsuit brought on constitutional grounds. It was because of “Texas’s claim that it would incur costs” and because “the Obama administration did not go through the APA’s notice and comment process when creating them.”